The long awaited
Bilski decision was released today, and while I haven’t had the chance to read it yet, I have skimmed the blogosphere enough to know what it said. Basically, the Federal Circuit went a little too far, and the Supreme Court is reining it in, saying that while the “Machine or Transformation” test is one way of deciding whether a process is eligible for a patent, it is not the only way. Essentially, the court restated old law that states an abstract idea is not patentable. Certainly nothing new. More analysis, for the laymen, later – once I’m able to read the case.
Contact Tom Today
602-281-6481
- I'm Tom Galvani, a patent and trademark lawyer in Phoenix, Arizona. I help inventors, entrepreneurs, and businesses develop and control their intellectual property. I host this site and the blog on it to give you an idea of the services I provide and to keep you updated on current developments and helpful information related to patents, trademarks, and copyright.
Tom’s Work
Recent Press
Others
- 3C Patent Law
- Anticipate This!
- Brand Geek
- Delaware IP Law Blog
- Fame Appeal
- IP Spotlight
- Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
- Law for Entreprenuers
- Likelihood of Confusion
- Patently-O
- Pittsburgh Trademark Lawyer
- Pope Hat
- Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log
- Seattle Trademark Lawyer – Michael Atkins
- Spam Notes
- Sustainable Marks – Green IP Blog
- This is Indexed

